Good point Mafud! The truth of the matter is, we have an idea of how durable the PZ-1p is. The new camera is as yet unproven. I see a distinct tendency by some to simply equate newer with better. The new MZ-S is just the next PZ-1p. I think taking any features away or downgrading specs from the PZ-1p was a mistake. I also agree with Wieland. At the MZ-S price point, where's the big advantage? To tell you the truth I've always been happy with the PZ-1p AF (except with my 80-320). Tom C. Maufud wrote: > >Speaking of the durability of the PZ-1p: >how many on the list have worn out a PZ-1p; or know of someone wearing out a >PZ-1p; and after how many tens of thousands of frames? > >What's *your* frame/roll count on *your* PZ-1p? > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
