Chris Brogden wrote:
> Now that I've gone through all of the trouble of asking for and recording
> cities, I'm having second thoughts over whether or not to include
> them. *L* And I can't even blame it on Monday, since that was
> yesterday. :) So, I'm asking as a public topic of conversation (you
> don't have to reply privately to me for this one), should I include cities
> in the data, or not? I'm not talking about the general summary that I'll
> post to the PDML, as that will only be broken down by country and
> (sometimes) state/province and will not have any names attached to
> it. I'm talking about the more detailed info that I'll mail directly to
> everyone who submitted their location for the list. What I want to know
> is whether the info should look like this:
>
> Canada, Manitoba, Winnipeg; Chris Brogden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> or like this:
>
> Canada, Manitoba; Chris Brogden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Chris, when you consider that the Province of BC, which is my location, is
larger than many countries (Vancouver Island alone is the size of England), I
think including Cities would be nice. Notice I am referring to the size of
the land mass, not the population.
Cheers, Mike.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
