Chris,
seems we are coming back around to your original concept!
(through marsh, mire & rugged terrain of course ;^)
Personally, I am for the original "wide AF" for the posted to
the PDML version w/ a "coupled rangefinder/spot AF" version
including emails (unless individually vetoed) being sent via
private email to the participants of the survey.
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: cities vs. no cities Chris Brogden
- Re: cities vs. no cities William Robb
- Re: cities vs. no cities Chris Brogden
- Re: cities vs. no cities Dan Scott
- Re: cities vs. no cities Chris Brogden
- Re: cities vs. no cities Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: cities vs. no cities John Francis
- Re: cities vs. no cities William Robb
- E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cit... Chris Brogden
- Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was... Chris Brogden
- Re: E-mails or no e-mails;... Bill D. Casselberry
- Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was... JeffW.
- Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was... John Glover
- Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was... Kristian-H. Sch�ssler
- Re: cities vs. no cities Dave Evans
- Re: cities vs. no cities Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: cities vs. no cities John Francis
- Re: cities vs. no cities Tom Rittenhouse
- RE: cities vs. no cities Matamoros, Cesar A.

