In a message dated 2/20/01 5:18:33 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< would this really be acceptable as evidence? the date back can be set to
most any time/date one feels like rather easily >>
Hah! You sound like a defense attorney<g>.
A copy of the negative(s) accompanied by a notarized statement from the
investigator-law enforcement officer attesting to the authenticity of date
and time is usually sufficient* to affirm the details "seen at the scene."
*"Eeedch" for digital "photographs" because digital ~images~ can be
"manipulated" in the camera or after the fact by nearly anyone who can run
and chew gum at the same time...even me.
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
