Hi Jean-Baptiste,

on 07 Dec 02 you wrote in pentax.list:

>Back to photography i'd like to get a Pentax camera before Christmas.

Welcome and congratulations to your choice of Pentax!


>e.g. RTS-III + 1,4/35 Zeiss = 2 kilos !). At first sight I didn't
>really care about the brand but i really like the idea of getting
>non-AF lenses (no lousy plastic as most AF lenses) working on the
>camera and vice-versa

That's one of the biggest advanteges of the Pentax system: you can use  
every Pentax lens on all Pentax bodies (afair there are only three  
bodies with restrictions: MZ-30, MZ-50 and MZ-60).

>MZ-3 is my final choice and the first lens i shall buy will be a 50mm
>as you may have guessed but i still have several questions.

Very good choice. I'm owning an MZ-5n which differs only in some mior  
things. I like their classic user interface. But you should also  
consider a MZ-S if it is not too expensive. It has a better viewfinder,  
faster AF and is made of metal (plus many more advantages).

>I mostly shoot B&W and Diapositives (ouch is that the english word for
>it : inversible films ? sorry i am french) so i need the spot mesure
>but will i get it ( and center-weighted) if i use non AF lenses ?

You will get spot and center-weigthed measuring with manual SMC ans SCM- 
M lenses. With manual SMC-A and autofocus SCM-F ans SMC-FA lenses you  
will get spot, center plus multi-segment metering.

>I am used to 100% viewfinders (like the Nikon F and RTS-III), most
>Pentax cameras get a 92% isn't that an issue (e.g. for diapositives)?

I don't shoot slides, so I can't tell you much about this. You should  
try a MZ-body in order to see if the viewfinder satisfies you.

...

>And finally Metz flashes are quite cheap here in France compared to
>Pentax : any idea of what i will get/loose if i get a Metz flash ( AF
>assistance for example) ?

I've still some lenses and a large Metz for sale. Look at  
www.mycroft.de/sale.html and mail me off-list for further information.  
Shipping from Germany to France is no problem.

Regards, Heiko

Reply via email to