Bruce Dayton wrote: > > So is anyone willing to update the lens gallery and add the > capabilities that Dan is talking about? At least more samples per > lens. > > Bruce
Why? Once you have a decent print/photo from a lens, lte's say an excellet example of good resolutino, contrast, etc., why muddy the waters by saying you want more photogs to express THEMselves thru that lens? What is to be gained? You've already SEEN what the lens will do! What are you looking for? keith whaley > Sunday, December 8, 2002, 3:17:21 PM, you wrote: > > DS> On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 04:41 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > > >> Dan, > >> > >> I thought that was what the lens gallery was for. > >> > >> > >> Bruce > >> > > DS> Well, I love the lens gallery--and there are some great photos in > DS> it--but it hasn't been updated in a couple years. > > DS> Plus, all the images from each lens represented is limited to samples > DS> submitted by one photographer. Being able to see samples from a given > DS> lens as used on different shots by a wider variety of shooters seems > DS> like a big plus to me. > > DS> Dan Scott
