Where did you find the fine art paper in 13x19 size. I gotta have it. BTW, I've taken some scans through to printing in 48-bit depth. It seemed that the gradation to partial shadow in flesh tones was more natural. Although I printed other very similar shots in 24-bit, I didn't do a direct comparison. But one of these days I will. I'm still using PhotoShop 6 and 48-bit is a handicap. Paul
Mark Roberts wrote: > > I just tried my first print on Hahnemuhl's "William Turner" Digital Fine Art > paper and I'm convinced it is indeed the same stuff as Ilford Fine Art. > Beautiful stuff, in other words. > > This was also my first attempt at keeping a scan at 48-bit color depth all > the way through to the printing stage (you get a lot more options for > dealing with 48-bit images in Photoshop 7). It makes for a 100 megabyte file > from a 35mm slide (scanning at 2600 dpi) but it certainly looks nice! (Of > course I'd have to convert to 24-bit color and do a direct comparison to see > how much difference it makes and I'm not about to do that at the moment, > given the price of 13 x 19 Fine Art paper!) > > -- > Mark Roberts > Photography and writing > www.robertstech.com
