I guess the part I don't understand is why Nikon would release a lens covering the smaller sensor when they've got a full-frame coming out? Do they think full-frame prices will never come down?
On a related note, I understand the argument that a smaller sensor may be sufficient to equal the quality of 35mm, but if a full-frame sensor can be expected to rival medium format then that's the one I want. Maybe they think the smaller sensor will surpass 35mm at some point. I'm confused. I'll wait and see what Pentax does, but I have to admit I'm concerned. I was content with the pace at which Pentax released new cameras in the past because I knew the quality of my prints depended on the lenses, not the camera. This is no longer true with digital - the body is no longer just a light-tight box. The sensor goes a long way towards determining the quality of your prints, and if Pentax is constantly 2 or 3 or 4 generations behind...well, that just wouldn't be a good thing. tv
