"tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I'll wait and see what Pentax does, but I have to admit I'm concerned. >I was content with the pace at which Pentax released new cameras in >the past because I knew the quality of my prints depended on the >lenses, not the camera. This is no longer true with digital - the body >is no longer just a light-tight box. The sensor goes a long way >towards determining the quality of your prints, and if Pentax is >constantly 2 or 3 or 4 generations behind...well, that just wouldn't >be a good thing.
Well if the latest trend is toward lenses with smaller-than-standard image circles to go with APS-sized digital sensors, I would prefer it if Pentax *were* 3 or 4 steps behind. If this were to be the one area in which they decided to be on the leading edge it would truly suck, erm...I mean "hoover" :( -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
