Hi Andre,
All the manual says is" Note that Auto bellows A cannot be used with this
camera because it cannot be fitted to it".

Maybe the flash is too close to the mount???? I been to Boz's site, but I
still can't figure out
which one Pentax is talking about. How many bellows are there. I want the
one where you attach a lens to the end, not the slide copier I keep on
seeing

He has these 2 finders - "2x FA-1 Eye-Level Finders(Standard), 1x FA-2
Eye-Level Finder"
He lives about 450km's from me so he'll have to post it.

To have a CLA done for me is simple, I take it to my buddy, Pentax sends a
driver to him in the morning, they quote me in 24hrs and the driver brings
it back, I only pay for parts & labour ,
but if i'm in a real hurry I can drop it off myself its about 25mins drive
from my house
- so who hates me :)

I'm thinking of buying LX, might be a better back than the K1000 SE I got.
What will sell after the CLA for $400, the LX or the finders?

Feroze


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andre Langevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX


> >Is there more than one Pentax bellows?
> >The MZS manual says that Auto Bellows A
> >cannot be used with this camera. There is
> >one on a local auction site for ZAR600 (about U$D60)
> >
> >He also has a LX, 3 Finders and a 55mm f1.8 lens plus filter
> >for ZAR 1500 (about USD150)
> >
> >Are both these worth the price???
> >
> >Feroze
>
> Good price for an Auto-bellows A. I would also like to know why it
> does not fit the latest Pentax body.
>
> The price for the LX is very low.  If you want an LX, go for it.
> You'll probably have to pay for a CLA, so 150 US $ plus shipping both
> ways but you can sell the two extra finders for this amount depending
> on their type.  You'll end up with a perfectly working LX for about
> 150$.  They sell, after CLA, 400$ to 600$ depending on cosmetics and
> year of manufacture. I could be interested to buy a finder from you
> if it is the type I'm looking for.
>
> Andre
> --
>
>

Reply via email to