Am I wrong or we should talk about lenses used and way they are used?
I put a reversed Componon on a bellows and photograph a dime at
double life size. On the monorail, I focus the same setting so that
the dime is 10 times life size. Componon being a fine performer at
both 1:2 and 1:10. So which negative will give me more detail from
the same lens?
Andre
--
- Re: auto bellows + LX Bob Blakely
- Re: auto bellows + LX William Robb
- Re: auto bellows + LX Peter Alling
- OT: Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Dan Scott
- Re: Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro William Robb
- Re: OT: Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro gfen
- Re: OT: Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Dan Scott
- Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Dr E D F Williams
- Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Bill D. Casselberry
- Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Keith Whaley
- Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Andre Langevin
- Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Dr E D F Williams
- Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Andre Langevin
- Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Keith Whaley
- Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro William Robb
- Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Paul Stenquist
- Re[2]: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Bruce Dayton
- Re: Re[2]: 35mm vs 8x10 macro William Robb
- Re: Re[2]: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Andre Langevin
- Re: Re[2]: 35mm vs 8x10 macro William Robb
- Re: Re[2]: 35mm vs 8x10 macro Dr E D F Williams

