Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro

[Paul Stenquist]

> 
>In a reply to this:

> > Those guys who wax elequent about the lack of grain and the
> > 'information' in the print, compared to 35mm prints,
> invariably fail
> > to mention that their negative was hardly blown up at all!

William Robb wrote: 
> Thats cause we find it so painfully obvious that we don't feel
> the need to.

ROFLOL