Thanks, No she doesn't really need it, and I printed this and a few other shots without the blur. I just wanted to try the Gaussian Blur layer. I recall Wheatfield mentioning it in previous posts. Paul
Dan Scott wrote: > > On Saturday, December 14, 2002, at 11:10 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > It was a 6x7 neg, and I scanned it on an Epson dual purpose scaner. I > > think the designationis 1860? It's a somewhat expensive flatbed, but > > that's because it has a big bed. It will only scan up to 2400 dpi, but > > I > > let it interpolate and scan at 3200 in 48 bit. I converted this scan to > > 24 bit after setting levels and curves, then did my additional work. > > Paul > > > > It looks great. Does the lady need the blur or did you do it for > aesthetics or glamour? > > Dan Scott
