Boris, I feel the same about PhotoSig. What I like the best is the way the sort the data. I can compare images shot taken with a specific camera or film.
Jeff. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 7:33 AM Subject: Re: Best photography websites > Hi! > > > Lon Williamson wrote: > > > > I refuse to be a member of PhotoNet because of how they denigrate, > > in 35mm, anything "below" Nikon or Canon. Good Shots there, and > > occasionally a good thread or two, but they are more anal than this > > group. Here, there's steady reinforcement that grey matter rules. > > In Photo Net, you get the feeling you have to spend $5000 to even start. > > I have to say I agree with Lon. When I just started this spring, I > thought of Photo.Net as of a great source. After all, as information > source it is excellent. Then I thought that I'd post some of my photos > so that people there critique me and this way I study. Usually they > would come, see and just not react. Once they've started giving one of > my photos some relatively high (to me) ratings, without saying a word. > Just come, see, give a rating, done. So I switched to PhotoSig. There > I was greeted with much more. Sometimes I couldn't get reasonably > useful critique. But sometimes it was just excellent - they've pointed > to my mistakes and I've learned. > > I still visit Photo.Net every now and then just to read news or look > at some discussion/forum thread. Though perhaps with time I will > abandon Photo.Net all together. All in all there is way too much > snobbism there. > > At least these are my humble two cents. > > --- > Boris Liberman > www.geocities.com/dunno57 > www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625 >
