Doug, Why do you say "intuitively"? I don't see it that way. It would still seem to come down to quality of equipment. Are you assuming that digital scanners are better resolution that the optical systems?
Please explain. Thanks, Bruce Sunday, December 15, 2002, 8:40:23 AM, you wrote: DF> On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:05:24 -0600, Mike Johnston wrote: >> [...] limits of enlargement are about 8-12x (depending no[t] so >> much on the granularity of the film as upon the quality of the >> enlarging lens and the technique of the printer-- [...] DF> So where are we when we convert the "optically enlarge, optically DF> print" steps of the process to "digitally enlarge, digitally print"? DF> Intuitively, it would seem that the potential for greater DF> magnifications would be increased. DF> TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
