On 15 Dec 2002 at 15:04, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Doug, > > Why do you say "intuitively"? I don't see it that way. It would > still seem to come down to quality of equipment. Are you assuming > that digital scanners are better resolution that the optical systems?
No Doug, but.. Once an image is in the digital domain the aberrations introduced in transformations are predictable and controllable i.e. they are a function of the algorithm used to facilitate the digital enlargement. No optical system like aberrations are introduced through digital scaling. Also most of the new scanners seem to incorporate some pretty advanced optics and they need to be to truly record resolutions of 4000dpi and above from film. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
