Yes. It would be a strictly professional tool. Professionals define what happens. To make their work faster and easier, they'll go to digital. Only professionals (or those that employ them) can afford a DSLR. Professionals will likely choose a Nikon or Canon. For Pentax to bother at all is silly IMHO. Why do we *need* a DSLR at this point in time? It's like big glass. Technology. Pentax cannot even provide literature that is new to North America. Pentax Canada doesn't stock anything (basically) for the MZ-S or the Medium Formats because there is just no demand. This I know. Why? Well, as one member said we are number 4 of the big 3.
Everyone has sources, and they just haven't added up to anything yet. I don't see anything big coming out, that's just my personal opinion. If they do, I'll have to see it in a store to believe it. Oh boy, this'll be good. Happy holidays, Brad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brendan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Re: Rumour mill again... > But! Pentax does not make products to show signalising > corporate health and corporate intentions but to sell! > > > --- P�l_Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dan wrote: > > > > > Entirely believable until you get to the "roughly > > $6,000.00" part. > > > Everyone knows that Pentax doesn't compete at that > > price level with > > > anyone. Had you said, "$899.99" or even "$549.99" > > I would find it > > > entirely credible, but "$6,000.00" shows someone > > is pulling someone's > > > leg or finger or something. > > > > None of the mega $$$ DSLR are being manufactured to > > "sell". They are statement products signalising > > corporate health and corporate intentions. > > > > P�l > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca > >
