All messages are received by PDML's remailer software, then resent to everybody on the list. The time involved would depend upon server load. I think the list server we are on probably handles many lists, so PDML volume itself would not be the only factor in the delay time.
This list is monitored (Doug reads it), but not Monitored (censored), though the software is set to remove certain kinds of e-mail (attachments, binaries, html, spam, etc) which is mentioned in the FAQ. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 7:27 AM Subject: Re: 6x6 - Waste of Space? An observation... > > Snipping all the text from the above subject message, I ask why is it > I've been seeing all pdml messages being 'resent'? > For instance, my latest message's header: > > Subject: Re: 6x6 - Waste of Space? (WAS: Re: Medium Format-Which > one is best?) > Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 07:13:20 -0500 > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 04:13:20 -0800 > From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This time, my message was resent almost instantly. Others I've seen > show some lag or time delay. > Is this because of moderator interaction? > As I recall, I had seen it before on occasion, but not all the time. > Now it seems it's always being 'resent.' > > Just curious... > > The recent discussion about UTC designators (-0500, -0800, etc) > sensitized me to the header info... > > keith whaley >
