T Rittenhouse wrote: > > All messages are received by PDML's remailer software, then resent to > everybody on the list.
That fits my observations, Tom. But why effectively 'stopped' and later resent, if not for an "approval" cycle? Pdml.net belongs to pdml alone, doesn't it? I guess I don't completely understand the machinations necessary between servers and remailers (or the need for them) and eventual release to the public, so I'll just let the subject drop. > The time involved would depend upon server load. I > think the list server we are on probably handles many lists, so PDML volume > itself would not be the only factor in the delay time. > > This list is monitored (Doug reads it), but not Monitored (censored), though > the software is set to remove certain kinds of e-mail (attachments, > binaries, html, spam, etc) which is mentioned in the FAQ. Okay, fair enough. I understand that, and Doug does a good job at that. And, I certainly am thankful about the html removal... I'm an assistant monitor on another list, and we retain the right to not pass on certain messages, if they won't fit a family list, stuff like that. So far, none of us (the owner nor the moderator(s)) has deleted any messages. Fortunately it hasn't become necessary. <smile> We've been lucky! > Ciao, > Graywolf > http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto Thanks for your words, keith whaley
