It's who he is. I think I'm just growing to accept it. Actually it's becoming amusing.
He knows EVERYTHING so he needs nothing from us. He has no actual advice to give. He misconstrues everything that is said. He acts like a baby when his concepts of nature are challenged. So why is he here? Well, everyone's welcome. I'm here aren't I? :) ------------------------------ I wish to thank everyone who actually did attempt to be helpful. I was reaffirmed in some things, heard other things I'll have to think about and try. He and Regards, Bob.... -------------------------------------------------------------------- "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy!" - Benjamin Franklin From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Just like Don to argue then tell everyone he's out of the discussion as > anyone's word besides his is "absolute rubbish". Anyone else notice the > pattern? > > From: "Dr E D F Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > abracadabra > > abracadabr > > abracadab > > abracada > > abracad > > abraca > > abrac > > abra > > abr > > ab > > a > > > > Right! > > > > Nature obeys no numbers. > > > > There are no recognised 'basic constants of the universe'. > > > > Numbers are no more special than we make them. > > > > DNA is not subject to ~mathematical~ constraints. > > > > Nothing in nature follows the 'Golden Section' - whatever that actually > may > > be. > > > > "All DNA is subject to mathematical constraints resulting from geometries > of > > the molecules making up the DNA which are in turn dictated by the > > mathematics of the geometry governing their individual atoms which is in > > turn the result of several of these universal constants." > > > > The above paragraph is meaningless rubbish. > > > > While it is true that the geometric arrangement of seeds on a sunflower > > inflorescence are aesthetically attractive, sunflowers, or something very > > like them, were growing aeons before numerical series were invented. > > > > -------------- > > > > I won't answer more of the ingenuous comments in this strange post - most > of > > which are absolute rubbish. Why? Because I begin, suddenly, to see > imaginary > > flecks of spittle in strange mathematical patterns between the lines. This > > poster reads what I have written, or gives the impression of having read - > > by adding a footnote - and then comes to utterly ridiculous conclusions. > > > > He might just as well have written "Blessed be Pi and his Holy name." It > > would have made just as much sense. Now I suppose the cat will truly be > > amongst the pigeons. Perhaps a magical doll will be constructed with > > Fibonacci, or golden proportions, and pins methodically inserted into > > various sensitive areas. > > > > Dr E D F Williams
