Raimo wrote:
> It�s not mystic and it is not unfathomable. It is not rules, either. It�s not > composition, it is the CONTENT. For goodness sake it was sarcasm. > Think about Henri Cartier-Bresson (or Ansel Adams) - the impact of the photos > is because of content, not composition. Yes, Adams� images have a lot of > content, too. Oh my good another rule! Try to have some contents in you images! P�l

