Raimo wrote:

> It�s not mystic and it is not unfathomable. It is not rules, either. It�s not 
> composition, it is the CONTENT.

For goodness sake it was sarcasm.

> Think about Henri Cartier-Bresson (or Ansel Adams) - the impact of the photos 
> is because of content, not composition. Yes, Adams� images have a lot of 
> content, too.

Oh my good another rule! Try to have some contents in you images!

P�l


Reply via email to