If you define impact has having produced the effect that the photographer desired than I would say yes. Have you seen the adverts for the BMW M3 CSL or the latest Nokia phone. They not artistic but technically correct photographs designed to sell a product-a means to an end. Feroze ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raimo Korhonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:56 PM Subject: Vs: Re[2]: Are some photographs better than others?
> Nope - people are making living with descriptive images: cars, clothes, utensils whatever and that�s the content. Of course it can be done well or badly and anything in between - and part of it is composition. But do these images have any impact? > All the best! > Raimo > Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho > > -----Alkuper�inen viesti----- > L�hett�j�: P�l Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > P�iv�: 03. tammikuuta 2003 20:29 > Aihe: Re: Re[2]: Are some photographs better than others? > > > >Raimo wrote: > > > >> What is a picture that�s full of composition but no content? > > > > > >It is picture that is better than an image without content that's also technically bad. People are making a living from technically perfect contentless images. Without technique you cannot express content. > > > >P�l > > > >
