Ah, of course. Perhaps one of the baby's blankets would serve? t
On 1/3/03 3:21 PM, Steve Pearson wrote: > I agree, however our babe is only 1 month old. So, > I'm pretty much stuck with "posed" shots, seeing as > how she can't even sit up on her own. She's just too > cute (biased of course) to not take any pics at this > early age! > > Thanks for the help, I will definately check out the > PUG as well. > > > --- Timothy Sherburne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi Steve... >> >> Not to through you a loop, but you may want to >> consider more "natural" >> backgrounds. I personally appreciate candid >> portraits that include a bit of >> the person's environment, but at a large enough >> aperture as to avoid >> distracting details. To me, backdrops seem to >> encourage unnatural and wooden >> posing (perhaps its the photographer's fault). Tom >> Van Veen's recent baby >> portrait post (from another thread) is a great >> example (just put your thumb >> over that loud coffee cup <g>): >> >> > <http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/derek/042902/22a.jpg> >> >> The PUG is loaded with other examples, too. >> >> t >> >> On 1/3/03 11:30 AM, Steve Pearson wrote: >> >>> I'm thinking of going with a white sheet for a >>> backdrop for some b&w's of our new baby. Seeing >> as >>> how I do not have any "professional" backdrops, my >>> choices are limited. I also have light blue, >> green, >>> tan, etc. colored blankets. >>> >>> Any thought as to which might look best? >>> >>> BTW, I will be trying the Pan-F. Do you guys >> shoot >>> Pan-F at something other than 50 ISO? >>> >>> Thanks again! >>> >>> __________________________________________________ >>> Do you Yahoo!? >>> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up >> now. >>> http://mailplus.yahoo.com >>> >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com >
