I apologize for butting into a thread which I have admittedly not been following, but the reason I've not followed it is because I simply find it absurd to even imagine that Pentax or any other manufacturer (Nikon and the F100), would make a body out of something that is in any way, less than satisfactory for a pro caliber camera. I personally have no worries at all about this, and would fully expect that Nikon and Pentax have both done their homework and these cameras will last longer than any of us will ever use them. Thanks, Ed - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell Alan Chan
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell mike wilson
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell PAUL STENQUIST
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell Ken Archer
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell John Mustarde
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell Ed Mathews
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell Dan Scott
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body she... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
- RE: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell Len Paris
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell mike wilson
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell Erwin Vereecken
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell Tom Rittenhouse
- RE: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell Alan Chan
- Re: MZ-S hands on: Magnesium body shell Mark Roberts

