Hi Steve, I have one or two I would offer for sale. How close do you live to Venice area? Seem to recell you're south of me in one of the beach cities. That so? Drop me a post, and in the meanwhile I'll decide which ones I will sell.
Keith Whaley L.A. ~ by Venice Steve Pearson wrote: > > Actually, I have an MX as well, that needs a 50mm > lens. So, my Super Program has the A 1.7 & I thought > I might try to find an M 1.4 for the MX. Anyone have > one for sale? Then, I could always swap the two back > & forth. > > --- gfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yOn Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Steve Pearson wrote: > > > I own the 50mm-A 1.7 lens. Seems that most think > > the > > > 1.4 is a better lens? Do you agree? Has anyone > > ever > > > done a side by side comparison? > > > > I had the M1.7 and replaced it withte A1.4. I can't > > give any good reasons, > > but I prefer the A over the M. Well, I mean reasons > > beyod the fact that > > its a half stop quicker and has an A setting. :) > > > > I alsoo had the A50/2. I preferred this one to the > > M1.7 for both the A > > setting and the fact that it was incredibly small > > and light. > > > > > I would like to pick up a 1.4, and also wonder if > > > there is much difference between the A version Vs. > > the > > > M version. This would be in the K mount, for a > > Super > > > Program, MX, etc. > > > > Well, in order to use the program andAv modes of > > your Super pProgram, you > > would need the A series. > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun > > than a poke in your eye. > > http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> > > photography and portfolio. > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
