I disagree. You can achieve very good image quality with any of the late model Pentax converters, such as the L2X-S, the A2X-S or the 1.4 X equivelants, and good Pentax glass. I know I've done it. If you wish, I'll show you some sharp and contrasty examples. Paul Stenquist
P�l Jensen wrote: > > Peter wrote: > > > I'm looking for a lighter & less $$$ "big lense" by > > using teleconverters with a FA* 300mm f2.8 instead of > > buying the FA* 600mm f4, but I still want high image > > quality. > > You can keep looking forever. High image quality with a 2X converter has never been >achieved in spite of what numerous people claims. It is then only a matter of >semantics of what constitutes high image quality. One thing is certain, no lens with >quality of any lens + a 2X converter would have achieved a reputation or providing >high image quality. A 2X converter spread whatever resolution your lens have over >twice the area. In addition, it add it's own distortion as a perfect lens has never >been made. You can do the math yourself. > > P�l
