Those are amazingly good. Both compositionally and technically.
At 09:03 PM 1/3/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Shalom.
You're only partially right. Here are some pictures I took with this
lens:
http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=544872 and
http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=559008
I don't think this lens is broken. And to start with Helios 44 is not
too much of a lens anyway...
---
Boris Liberman
www.geocities.com/dunno57
www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625
===8<==============Original message text===============
It is called destroyed lens. ;-)
Shalom,
Jeff (Zeev).
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a lens that was loaned to me by my friend who actually made it.
> He took old Helios 44K-4 lens (58mm f/2) and took out all but front
> element. How is it called in English: monocle? monocular?
>
> Please, this is just a simple question of language...
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Boris
>
>
===8<===========End of original message text===========
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
