Your welcome, John. I've only shot one roll of Delta 3200, but I think I
might come to like it. It's obviously a completely different film than
TMZ, a look at development charts makes that clear. I shot my first roll
at 3200 and processed it "by the book" in D-76. The negs were a little
too thin for my taste. I needed a 4 1/2 filter to get good prints, but
the results were promising, particularly in respect to grain. However, I
think I'm losing something when the negative is so thin that I have to
go to that extreme a paper or filter. I'm going to try shooting the next
roll at 1600 and processing it at 3200.
pUl
John Francis wrote:
> Thanks - I thought nobody had noticed!
> That was Delta 3200, shot and processed at 3200.
> The lack of sharpness is probably because I was down at 1/60th (@f2.8),
> and even with a monopod that's pushing it a bit for a 300m focal length.
> (That explains the nonexistent depth of field, too).
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
