----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: Push Processing C-41 films


> "I am wondering what the group wisdom is regarding which C-41
films are
> used for push processing, and which ones work the best for
this
> purpose."
>
> Er...I thought you insisted here several times that this was
not
> possible.

I still insist it is not possible. I intend to prove it, using
films that people insist are pushable.
In case anyone thinks I am approaching this with a closed mind,
some may remember that internet opus that I did with the film
tests a few years ago.
What started as an argument between Valentin and myself
regarding whether Fuji or Kodak was the better film devolved
into a pretty scientific analysis of about 40 different films
from as many manufacturers as I could find product from.
It turned out that speed for speed, Fuji had better granularity
and resolution than the competing Kodak products, and I showed
this to be true, even though it was exactly the opposite of what
I had said at the start.

>
> I've shot NHGII 800 (now discontinued) and Supra 800 with a
one-stop
> push. Both were okay, but I thought the NHG gave better color
and grain.
> Now, based on your previous statements, Bill, I just shoot NPZ
at 800
> but underexpose by one stop when I need to. So far that works.

I'll see what Fuji has out there this week, probably pick up
some NPZ and Supra, and I will try to find some Ferrania because
the good Doctor insists it can be pushed successfully.
>
> May I ask why you are now inquiring about this?

Its cold out and I need an indoor project.
Also, I bought a densitometer off eBay this spring, and really
want to do something with it.
L8R
Bill


Reply via email to