eactivist wrote:

(about an FA 400mm f/2.8)
> I'd go with that -- something good for wild life photography that would
> not also break the bank.

Nevermind the bank... I want a fast AF 400mm that won't break my *back*.
Hence my desire for a 400mm f/4.0.  The f/5.6 is a bit slow for my 
liking.  I've held a Nikon 400mm f/3.5 and its not too bad for size and 
weight.

Cheers,

- Dave

http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/


Reply via email to