As with anything at all, Peter, an item is "worth" what the buyer will pay for it. That I personally think it's outrageous is beside the point. I know that. I still think it's worth more...so if I have one, I either keep it and shut up about it, or sell it for far less than it's real worth. But, up to me.
Thanks, keith Peter Alling wrote: > > I'll be an annoying economist here, you may think it's worth $40.00 but if you > can buy them for a lot less then clearly they aren't. > > At 04:33 PM 1/3/2003 -0800, you wrote: > >If an SMC Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7 is worth $40, there's no question in my > >mind the SMC Pentax-A 50mm f/2.0 is worth at least as much. > >For $15-20, I'd be glad to keep it, and all of it's bretheren you can find... > > > >Assessing a price/worth of $15-20 is ridiculous! > > > >keith whaley > > > >* * * * > > > >Dan Scott wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 02:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > what do folks have to say about the smc a 50/2 > > > > > > > > is it worth $40 us? > > > > > > > > and yes I am in a very poor phase in my life right now. > > > > > > > > Bran > > > > > > > > > > I'd say it's worth about $15 to $20. The SMC A 50/1.7 is worth $40. > > > > > Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. > Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
