Hi! RS> I would guess that anyone here who is critical of quality would be keen to RS> acquire a Pentax K mount 11MP DSLR (or better), lager files mean more RS> flexibility WRT post image manipulation and print sizes.
Well, this is a valid point. I think I'd ask some questions to collect some data... Please if you don't mind: While you're answering please relate to 95% of your work, not special wall-size occasions. 1. If you scan your negatives (35 mm of course), how many megapixels do you use in your final scan? 2. When you get to print your photographs from the above scans, until how many megapixels do you enlarge your resulting files? Please, I am *not* interested in the size of the print outs, I am interested in number of pixels only. You see, I must admit that all my reasoning applies only to amateurs, or to be more precise to such occasions where photographer does not get paid for their work. Being such myself, I am completely satisfied with 3000x2000 image files I get from the lab I am dealing with. This includes fair amount of cropping just as well. Naturally, I am talking about the picture quality here, only number of pixels. Let's see how generous you are :). --- Boris Liberman www.geocities.com/dunno57 www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625
