Dnia 14-01-2003 o godz. 9:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Heiko Hamann) napisal(a): > Hi Steve, > > >trees, fences, etc., were quite easily visible to the eye. The LX > >exposures of roughly 30 sec at f/5.6. Rather short, I think, compared > >to some of the suggested exposure tables that I've seen, and sure enough, > >the negatives are so badly underexposed as to be useless. > > That's too short, really. If there was no additional light source than > the LX should have made a longer exposure. I can't imagine, what the > cause was. But maybe you have a look at > > http://www.designshed.com/lostframe.html > > There are some interesting tips and links concerning night photography. > I really like that page...
Maybe, Steve, you have some exposure correction set? Other thing is, that Ilford XP2 needs some corrections due to reciprocity failure. If I recall correctly it is about 4x the metered time at 30sec - so it would be 2min exposure. But apart from that, 30sec in theese conditions seems rather short exposure. Maciej ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Daj się poznać! Wstaw swoje zdjęcie! Nowy KONTAKT pozwala ZOBACZYĆ internetowych przyjaciół !< http://kontakt.wp.pl >
