Fred, I did the exact opposite. I kept the fisheye zoom 17-28 (zoomed in it is near a 20mm), sold the FA 20, kept the FA *24, sold the FA 28, and kept the FA 35.
The ones I sold were due to lack of use and this nasty habit called P67. Bruce Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 11:09:08 PM, you wrote: >> My Vivitar Series One 28/1.9K and Pentax SMC 35/2K rival the SMC >> f/3.5Ks (except, perhaps, in freedom from distortion) while giving >> me a brighter view. Yet if I were starting over, I'd get the SMC >> 30/2.8K to simplify my choices. I sold my SMC 24/2.8K for this >> reason. (I have a 20.) F> I've done something similar. I own (and plan on keeping) my 35mm, F> 28mm, and 20mm lenses. However, I used to also own the K 30/2.8 and F> the A 24/2.8, but I have since sold both, since I found that I just F> never seemed to use them. For me and my own idiosyncratic (and F> undoubtedly tragically flawed) shooting style, I really don't need a F> 30mm lens between the 35mm and 28mm FL's, or a 24mm lens between the F> 28mm and 20mm FL's (although the gap from 20mm to 28mm is a lot F> wider than is the gap from 28mm to 35mm). F> Fred
