> > > > > > > William Robb wrote: > > > Some things just can't be quantified with mere numbers. Scanning film is a > bastard technology at best. > Comparing a digitized negative to a digitized digital is flawed from the > start. > True. But comparing a wet print to a digitized digital is perhaps even more flawed. I guess it's a pointless argument. Although in my own experience, scanned color negatives printed on ink jet have replaced color wet prints. They're just better. Of course the same is not true of BW. Paul
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to ... T Rittenhouse
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be y... Bruce Rubenstein
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes P�l Jensen
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes Mark D.
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes Boris Liberman
- RE: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes J. C. O'Connell
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes William Robb
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes Paul Stenquist
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be y... William Robb
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to ... Paul Stenquist
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes Paul Stenquist
- RE: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes J. C. O'Connell
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes Herb Chong
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes Rfsindg
- RE: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes Collin Brendemuehl
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes Mike Johnston
- Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes Herb Chong

