Let's look at it this way. If tomorrow you and another photographer shoot the same subject. Which one of you gets paid for it depends on whose shots are delivered to the customer first, which camera would you chose?
About a year back I met a fine arts photographer. He showed me 30x40s that were shot on 8x10 transparency film. He pointed out the differences between the digital prints and the Ilfochrome prints, saying, "As you can see the chemical prints are still a little better". I would not have noticed the subtilities if he had not pointed them out, and at normal viewing distance for 30x40 prints I doubt anyone else could either. He was only scaning at 1200dpi so his files were only in the 115 megapixel range. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Waterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:27 AM Subject: Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes > This one time, at band camp, > "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One of our local pro types has sold off his 6x7 in favour of the D60. He > > says he just can't justify shooting film anymore. > > He is primarily a wedding photographer. > > I think this issue is easily resolved in this manner.. > If tommorow, you had to shoot one photo, (portrait, landscape, etc), > and you were to be judged on that single photo, what body would you choose > to buy today? > > Kind regards > Kevin > > -- > Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. > See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html > Kevin Waterson > Port Macquarie, Australia >
