Better question is the Tamron lens with a Pentax name on it better than the same lens with Canon on it? Or maybe the one with Nikon's name is better? Let's start a new thread, my lens has a better name than your lens. An just in case anyone thinks this is something new, is the Wollensak Rapter on my 1952 Graphic any better because it says Graphlex Optar on it?
Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----- Original Message ----- From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:07 AM Subject: RE: I'll never shut up. was Re: Okay, I'll shut up now > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > On another note, I just downloaded a 38mb file from Kodak, > > a straight dump > > from the Kodak 14(?)mb camera. > > A couple of tweaks in photoshop to make it look right on my > > system, and sent > > it to the printer. > > At 8x10, it pretty much matches what I would expect from > > one of my 4x5 film > > images printed in the darkroom WRT clarity and granularity. > > Quite awesome, I must say. > > Meow. I think I'd be more likely to buy this than the Canon. > > New thread - Are Nikon lenses better than Canon? > > HAR! > > tv > > >
