Hi! >> Does anyone else see this as a very big security problem, (I always hated >> the Idea >> of Bluetooth and it still doesn't have enough security as far as I'm >> concerned).
DF> I agree. What I really want is a WiFi/Bluetooth stereo system, and get DF> rid of all those patch cables behind my entertainment center. But not DF> until I can protect them from any Tom, Dick, or Harry coming along and DF> scooping up the CD I'm playing or whatever. Doug, are you ready to accept the quality loss that inevitably would seem to take place when the signal gets on the air and back again? I don't think such stereo is viable before all the parts involved would be able to digitize the signal with the highest quality possible and then transmit it... The CD player can do digital fiber output now. What about turntable or cassette deck? Or you don't deal with old tech? <midsize grin> As for the security. There's always going to be some people who would be able to break whatever security is in place. The only difference that various security systems make is the cost and difficulty of overcoming them. Back to topic though. I wonder how difficult would it be to design a 35mm style SLR that would have interchangeable sensors. Come, my hands for instants are both left so to say. I would inevitably break my camera if I were to perform such a trick... But then again, perhaps average PDMLer is handier than me :). Wait, it should be <grin>, right? --- Boris Liberman www.geocities.com/dunno57 www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625
