The 2.8-4.0/28-105 AF IF Asph it is. Strange. Must be a misprint. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 21. tammikuuta 2003 17:57 Aihe: Re: Vs: AF Dilemma >it's the 28-105mm F2.8-4 , are you sure it's the same >lens? cause I'd like to know who they improved it, >it's not the build but the optics that are horrible, >with it's patented gumby(tm) distortion. > > --- Raimo Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > Which one? I used to have the 2.8-4/28-105 and it was not good at the long end. Now >I got the test issue of Foto Magazin (GER) 2/2003 and they have given it 9.2/10 of both optical and mechanical quality and five stars. Has Sigma improved the quality? Pentax 24-90 gets only 8.4 and 8.6. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho >> >> -----Alkuper�inen viesti----- >> L�hett�j�: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> P�iv�: 21. tammikuuta 2003 14:48 >> Aihe: Re: AF Dilema >> >> >want my sigma 28-105 :-) >> >
