sample variation lol. --- Raimo Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 2.8-4.0/28-105 AF IF Asph it is. Strange. Must > be a misprint. > All the best! > Raimo > Personal photography homepage at > http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho > > -----Alkuper�inen viesti----- > L�hett�j�: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > P�iv�: 21. tammikuuta 2003 17:57 > Aihe: Re: Vs: AF Dilemma > > > >it's the 28-105mm F2.8-4 , are you sure it's the > same > >lens? cause I'd like to know who they improved it, > >it's not the build but the optics that are > horrible, > >with it's patented gumby(tm) distortion. > > > > --- Raimo Korhonen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > > Which one? I used to have the 2.8-4/28-105 and it > was not good at the long end. Now I got the test > issue of Foto Magazin (GER) 2/2003 and they have > given it 9.2/10 of both optical and mechanical > quality and five stars. Has Sigma improved the > quality? Pentax 24-90 gets only 8.4 and 8.6. > All the best! > Raimo > Personal photography homepage at > http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho > >> > >> -----Alkuper�inen viesti----- > >> L�hett�j�: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> P�iv�: 21. tammikuuta 2003 14:48 > >> Aihe: Re: AF Dilema > >> > >> >want my sigma 28-105 :-) > >> > > >
______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
