Suboptical distance? You must be kidding ;-) This kind of distances occur in microscopy, not in digital cameras. Why do you think the cameras interpolate across the gaps? All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: Ryan K. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 27. tammikuuta 2003 19:11 Aihe: Re: Vs: Comparing digital to film >Raimo Korhonen wrote: >> Nah - pixels have a threshold like film. And between one pixel and another pixel >there is a gap, like film, only larger. Digital loses fine detail but this seems not >to be important. > >That gap is a suboptical distance- no information is "lost" between pixels. > >>
