On 27 Jan 2003 at 14:06, Ryan K. Brooks wrote: > This is getting like the misinformation about edge fall off because the > wells are too deep that we had last year. Where's that argument now? I > still stand behind my yield statement. > > "Oh no, the sky is falling, and the camera is making up information > between pixels".
I'm not disputing your pixel fill arguments however the well depth (and micro- lens implementations) were and still in some new implementations do create problems with light fall off. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
