Re: 31 and 35mm lenses tested in German magazine

[Bruce Rubenstein]

If someone would like to lend me a MZ-S for 6 months I would be glad to compare it to a F100. My comments pertained to specific model cameras, because that it what I have experience with. Now, I happen to have D and non D lenses. Monitor preflash and multisegment TTL metering is still done with non D lenses. I, and a number of people, have a hard time telling if D lenses make any real difference.
People get so absorbed with manufacturer spec/feature/number sheets that they don't realize that how well implemented something is is more important than techno-market-speak. "My P-TTL beats your E-TTL, because its a higher letter in the alphabet!"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,
But you compare F100 with MZ5 which uses distant information but has not advanced flash metering. You should compare F100 with MZS. And it must be truth with distant information since when Pentax introduced P-TTL they have not changed anything in lenses!!It proves that it should be similar to Nikon metering.So one can use FA lenses having P-TTL unlike Nikon users who have to buy "D" lens and Minolta ones who have to buy "G" lens.
Alek