Peter Alling posted: > (Let's not get into the what's a professional or professional camera et. > al. again, Please).
Oh. Sorry. By the way I sent my second post on this thread before reading the above. However, it *is* a bit more on-topic than some of the other issues that are fought about here -- f*rea*rms and such) and I am now becoming definitely curious as to why the two people who have stated in this thread that the LX is unreliable are the very same two people who declare that it's the only pro 35mm camera Pentax produced. I'm just wondering what's the reason for their statements. It can't be that these two gentlemen think the LX is the only pro model because it's the most reliable model, since they both consider it unreliable. It also can't be that Pentax claimed to have only made one pro 35mm model -- they didn't. So, why?
