Mr Chan posted: > A product that was designed and manufactured to be used heavily or > professionally, doesn't mean it must be reliable.
I disagree. If it is designed to be used heavily then that includes performing reliably under that kind of use. > Luxury german cars are expensive too, but that doesn't mean they are as reliable as Honda or > Toyota. I think this is another matter entirely. Something may be expensive because it is a "luxury" product, or it may be expensive because it is designed for heavy use, but that doesn't mean a luxury product is designed for heavy use; in fact, many aren't. > And what a company claimed doesn't neceassily mean it must be true. Understood. Although they are supposed to know what they intend their products to do. In any case, my question was why did you disagree with them? Not in the sense of "how dare you disagree with them?" by any means, but "what were your reasons?" > It is perfectly fine if you don't buy these ideas, but please don't take > this personal. Well, I'm not taking it personally and I hope you aren't either. Discussion of differing opinions is fair, isn't it?
