And 35mm coverage of the flash on the PZ-1, the PZ-1p has 28mm coverage. The exposure correction for flash is way nicher/easier on the 1p. (I have the PZ-1, this is really the feature I mess most on my camera versus the PZ-1p) The PZ-1 has an interval setting, you can shoot a picure every xxx minutes/hours, the PZ-1p doesn't have that at all. This is the only feature where the PZ-1 has more to offer.
Although I tend to agree with Bob S. that you won't miss much on the PZ-1, it depends on what you intend to use the most if this is an issue or not. Anyway, I don't see a reason to exchange it for a PZ-1p now, but I should have bought the PZ-1p in the first place when I bought my PZ-1. AAA Camera Exchange talked me into the PZ-1, I won't have that happen to me again. On Saturday 15 February 2003 11:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Rob, > Motor drive on PZ-1 is slower, 2 fps vs 3+ for the PZ-1p. > No annoying Panorama frame lines in PZ-1 viewfinder, no Panorama at all ! > Some functions get buried in the PF options on the PZ-1. > It seems like they brought some out of hiding on the PZ-1p. > Spot metering with old M & K lenses works on the PZ-1p, not the PZ-1. > Overall, you won't miss much with the PZ-1 as a backup to the PZ-1p. > Regards, Bob S. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > what is the functional difference between the pz-1 and the updated pz-1p? > > > > i ask because i'm thinking of acquiring a pz-1 as a backup body to my > > glorious pz-1p -- Frits W�thrich Pentaxianado
