On Tuesday, Feb 18, 2003, at 17:50 Europe/Warsaw, Rob Brigham wrote:
My mistake - that's a relief!Well, changing MZ-S for *ist would be pure nonsense. It would be just like changing LX for a newer and better equipped P50 :-)
I actually think I would prefer an mz-6 to this, unless I wanted to
retain a common interface with a digital. Mind you, I have the Mz-S and
MZ-30, and while I would buy an ist or a 6 rather than the 30 today, I
don't think I will buy another film camera. The MZ-S will do me for a
long time, and I cant remember the last time I needed the 30 - its
purely an emergency backup these days.
Regards
Sylwek
