gfen, I can say that I much prefer the aspect ratio of 67 over 35mm. Most of the time 35mm feels just too long and narrow. Also knowing that I am shooting pretty close to full frame for 8X10 has been nice.
The aspect ratio of 645 was another minor turnoff for me. Not big enough to factor into the decision, just a minor one. Bruce Monday, February 24, 2003, 12:23:08 PM, you wrote: g> On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Bruce Dayton wrote: >> My proofs come back as 4X5 from the lab. I would guess that has to do >> with lab issues, not format issues. g> 67 or 645? I was referring to my 645 full frame prints, I believe you're g> one of those 67 guys though, right? :) g> I know that Bob Monohan's medium format supersite has a section about the g> actual sizes and ratios of prints from 645, and how much you need to crop g> to fit an 8x10 enlargment.
