Hi Peter,
     I really enjoyed your page on AF testing.  Confirms the same thing I've
found with the ZX5N, although I've also found a decent amount of error at
infinity with some lenses too.

Thanks,
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Spiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax FA 35 mm f2.0 AL vs Stylus Epic


> The Stylus Epic has a great lens for the price, and generally gives very
> nice results.  I have actually done comparison shots between it and my
> Pentax 40mm f/2.8, both at about f/5.6, and the Pentax was noticeably
> sharper in the details (e.g., small letters on a sign).
>
> Probably the most significant problem with the Stylus is the perverse
> program that's built into it, which is very much biased toward fast action
> (or photographers with really shaky hands).  Until the light is enough to
> give you a shutter speed over 1/200th, it shoots with the lens wide open
at
> f/2.8.  This gives you very limited depth of field, and no lens is at its
> best wide open.  So you need to use ASA 400 or 800 film with it unless you
> are always going to be in bright sunshine.
>
> I do like its tiny size, and I use it for travelling when an SLR is just
too
> bulky (or I'm using the SLR for slides and the Stylus for prints).  A few
> shots I've taken with it can be found at
> http://ca.geocities.com/spirope/photopage.htm
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to