Re: How about a 600/2.8 or a 100-400/2.8-3,5?

[Leonard Paris]

Yeah, but if we want Pentax to continue in the business, we could consider 
being a bit more up=beat about their products. We seem to have an ability to 
spread negative information about new products before we know the facts.  We 
look at a picture of a new camera and find ways to pick it apart before 
we've read any of the hands-on reviews, much less had a chance to read the 
manual or or give it a test drive ourselves.

It's almost like we want Pentax to fail and orphan our equipment. Being 
hardest on those we love has been responsible for a lot of divorces.

Len
---





From: Nick Zentena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How about a 600/2.8 or a 100-400/2.8-3,5?
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:11:30 -0500
On March 4, 2003 08:00 am, Leonard Paris wrote:
> I think you are right, Paul. I think that the worst possible thing that
> could happen to Pentax would be for all prospective Pentax buyers to 
find
> and read the PDML before they made their purchase.  For a user's group, 
we
> seem to be pretty negative about Pentax's efforts.

	You're always hardest on those you love-))

Nick



_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail